I’ve posted about the Drawing of the Three before.  Here is a selection of what I said:


I talked about how much I love King’s writing style.  As I said then it is almost like you could take this book and read it around a campfire.  What am I saying?  You could do that.  I actually found myself doing that a few times while I was reading the book, even though I was alone.  Remember: talking to yourself does not mean that you are crazy.  It’s when you start answering yourself that you have to worry.

In any case, the Drawing of the Three is the second book in the Dark Tower series and we follow Roland as he recovers from his meeting with the man in black.  In the prologue to the novel the gunslinger is just coming to from an unconscious state.  He awakens in time to save his life, but not in time to save part of his foot and two of his fingers as they are eaten by what come to be known as the lobstrosities (a name I love by the way).  Throughout the rest of the book Roland must deal with a potentially deadly infection from the wounds.  He also must contend with bullets that were immersed in water and thus potentially may not fire.

As he is getting sicker, Roland finds a door and eventually ends up in the head of Eddie Dean.  Eddie is a heroin addict and is in the midst of smuggling drugs into the country when Roland appears in his head.  They work together to get Eddie out of trouble, both with customs and then the drug dealer he had been sent on this drug run for.  In the process Eddie’s brother is killed making him dislike the gunslinger for a long time, especially as he has come through to the world that has moved on and also has to kick his habit.

A second door reveals a ‘schizophrenic named both Odetta Holmes and Detta Walker.  We are taken through a history of Odetta’s work during the Civil Rights Movement and then her alter ego’s racist ranting.  It appears that neither of them are aware of each other until the very end when they unite and form a new personality: Susannah (perhaps explaining the title of book six of the series).

The final door reveals The Pusher, a truly horrible serial killer who likes to push people in front of oncoming vehicles, or to smash them over the head with bricks.  The Pusher was responsible for Odetta’s onset of ‘schizophrenia’ as he dropped a brick on her as a child.  He was also the one who pushed her in front of an oncoming A-train, causing her to lose her legs.  Roland saves Jake (from the first novel) as he was an intended victim of The Pusher.  He uses this man to get penicillin for himself and, as it turns out, Eddie and also to get more bullets.

In the end the lone gunslinger becomes a trio (what is it with fantasy stories and the trios?) and they are pressing ever onward to The Dark Tower.

More thoughts on the book:

Obviously I wasn’t able to keep all of my opinions out of the above summary.  I have to admit that I did like this story.  I liked the drawing of the three, particularly Odetta/Detta.  I also really loved the idea in the end of the time paradox.  Did the man in black actually push Jake because Roland had prevented The Pusher from doing it in the first place?  I think that was the idea.  I love all of those alternate reality/mucking with the space-time continuum stories so this intrigued me.  I can’t wait to read the next part of the series.

I do take issue with the ‘schizophrenia’ idea, as you might have guessed from my use of quotations.  From the description that is given it sounds to me more like Dissociative Identity Disorder (or Multiple Personality Disorder).  I suppose I could see elements of schizophrenia in here in terms of the disordered thoughts and associations that are made by Detta, but the fact that there were two different, essentially distinct personalities is not Schizophrenia.  I doubted myself and I had to check in the DSM-IV, but I am right.  I suppose it doesn’t really detract from the story, it is just one of those irksome things for someone who knows more than the lay person about psychology.

And then The Pusher: Jack Mort.  He was death that was talked about in the first book.  Do you think he was named Mort unintentionally?  I do not.  I love it.  Oh, and speaking of names: Jack Andolini?  The name probably wouldn’t have got me so much but I just recently watched the Godfather.  I’m sure that Andolini isn’t unique to that movie but . . . I just found it amusing.


Oy vay.  I take issue with the way the post was written.  It obviously was not edited at all, or very well.  I have found on a second read through that I loathed the Odetta/Detta section.  It was just too far overdone.  The one\ly saving grace is the conscious awareness that she seems to be faking it.  That, however, feels like it was an afterthought, something that would have been added during editing.


And in hindsight, the whole story does not stand on its own at all.  It is part of a larger narrative, and it feels very much like that.   To draw a comparison to Harry Potter, or Lord of the Rings, this is the creation of the trio, or of the fellowship drawn out to novel length.


One thing that has not changed, though, is my dark fascination with the lobstrosities and their ‘lawyerly questions.’ (Did-a-chick, Dud-a-chum’).  While not my favourite King novel, it does set up the continuance of the Dark Tower series, and makes me anxious to read The Waste Lands again.

One thought on “The Drawing of the Three – Stephen King

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s